Detailed papers making the case for policy changes
Alliance for Corporate Transparency: 2018 Research ReportFriday, February 8th, 2019
The Alliance for Corporate Transparency (ACT) project (of which CORE is a member) has published its “2018 Research Report” analysing how over 100 EU companies from the Energy, ITC, and Health Care sectors disclose information necessary for understanding their impact on society and the environment, following the implementation of the EU’s Non-financial Reporting Directive. The report finds that although companies acknowledge in their reports the importance of environmental and social issues, but more often than not this information is not clear enough in terms of concrete issues, targets and principal risks.
Who made our uniforms? U.K. Public Sector Apparel Procurement: Ensuring Transparency and Respect for Human RightsFriday, September 28th, 2018
This report by CORE and ICAR reveals that that a third of companies that have supplied uniforms for UK public sector workers, including the armed forces and prison officers, have not reported on what they are doing to tackle slavery in their supply chains. It reveals that few contractors supplying uniforms and specialist safety clothing to the UK public sector are transparent about their ethical standards and international suppliers, and recommends that the UK Government take significant steps to ensure its contractors are more transparent and are meeting their responsibilities to respect human rights.
Risk Averse: Company Reporting on raw material and sector-specific risks under the Transparency in Supply Chains clause in the UK Modern Slavery Act 2015Tuesday, October 3rd, 2017
This report provides a snapshot of company Slavery and Human Trafficking statements published in compliance with the Transparency in Supply Chains clause in the Modern Slavery Act 2015, focusing on companies that produce or provide products and services to a large number of customers, including other businesses. We examine statements from 25 businesses who source raw materials and commodities associated with a heightened risk of modern slavery and 25 operating in sectors known to be at heightened risk of labour rights abuses.
Legal implications of the UK Referendum on EU membership for corporate accountability work in the UKMonday, February 20th, 2017
This paper by Deborah Doane and Dr. Jennifer Zerk sets out the findings of research commissioned by CORE to consider the legal implications of Brexit for corporate accountability work in the UK. There are an estimated 13,000 pieces of regulation that will be impacted by Brexit. While not all of these are relevant to corporate accountability, many EU laws are intended to raise standards of corporate behaviour and provide strong protections for workers, consumers, and the environment.
Above the law? Time to hold irresponsible companies to accountMonday, December 21st, 2015
In this report, Traidcraft and CORE set out how gaps in the legal framework are allowing irresponsible companies to get away with actions in developing countries which would not be acceptable in the UK. It shows how some companies are turning a blind eye to forced evictions, unacceptable labour standards, pollution which damages both livelihoods and health, and even beatings and deaths.
The Bottom Line: UK Corporate Abuse OverseasThursday, December 10th, 2015
The world over, some UK businesses are behaving in ways that would be unacceptable at home and getting away with it. This report brings together ten recent case studies of serious abuses linked to UK corporations’ international operations.
The EU’s Business: Recommended actions to ensure access to judicial remedy for business-related human rights impactsThursday, February 5th, 2015
In 2014, Association Sherpa, CORE, the European Center for Constitutional and Human Rights, ECCJ and Frank Bold launched a project to develop recommendations to improve access to judicial remedy in the EU for victims of corporate human rights abuses. The project revealed that similar problems are encountered across jurisdictions; there are clear opportunities for the EU to provide leadership and guidance to Member States to support them to address these issues. This paper summarises the outcomes and presents a plan of recommended actions on how to tackle identified barriers to justice.
The Third Pillar: Access to Judicial Remedy for Human Rights Violations by Transnational BusinessMonday, December 2nd, 2013
States are failing in their obligation to ensure access to effective judicial remedies to victims of human rights violations by businesses operating outside their territory. Two years from the universal endorsement of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, there is more work to be done. This report by CORE, European Coalition for Corporate Justice and International Corporate Accountability Roundtable (ICAR) identifies and analyses the barriers to remedy in the United States, Canada, and Europe, setting out detailed recommendations for the actions States should take to address the issue. An unofficial Chinese translation of the report is also available: 第三大支柱： 让跨国公司侵犯人权行为的受害者获得司法救济.
Reality of Rights: barriers to accessing remedies when business operates beyond bordersWednesday, May 25th, 2011
CORE & The London School of Economics (LSE) review examples from Kenya, India, Bangladesh, Georgia and Nigeria, and demonstrate how political, social and economic obstacles leave victims of alleged human rights violations without remedy.
Simply Put: Towards an Effective UK Regime for Environmental and Social Reporting By CompaniesWednesday, March 23rd, 2011
Simply Put provides an expert analysis of how the current legal framework is failing and what changes need to be made to the existing social and environmental corporate reporting regime. Through smart and straightforward amendments, the report identifies how existing legal requirements could be simplified and streamlined to take the guesswork out of corporate compliance.
Filling the Gap: a new body to investigate, sanction and provide remedies for abuses committed by UK companies abroadThursday, December 25th, 2008
This discussion paper was written to stimulate debate amongst corporate accountability campaigners and policy makers. The report aims to identify a way of filling the gap between, on the one hand, a series of relatively toothless soft law and self-regulatory initiatives, and, on the other hand, a domestic civil liability system which is fraught with difficulty for claimants.
Fit for Purpose? A review of the UK National Contact Point (NCP) for the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises 2008Tuesday, November 25th, 2008
In 2005, MPs challenged the government to resolve inadequacies of the UK NCP, the government unit tasked with providing a degree of accountability for the environmental and human rights impacts of British companies operating abroad. This resulted in significant reforms to the NCP procedures. However, the findings in this report by Rights & Accountability in Development (RAID) in association with CORE and The Trades Union Congress (TUC), indicated that significant problems remained.
Why Corporate Social Responsibility is Failing ChildrenWednesday, March 14th, 2007
This report by CORE & Save the Children reviews the implementation of the International Code on Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes; The Extractive Industries Transparencies Initiative (EITI); and The Ethical Trading Initiative (ETI) and reveals how all have been breached by leading companies.